Most Active Stories
- Coleman Barks, Interpreter of Sufi Poet Rumi, Is Coming (Back) To Chattanooga
- Celebration of Southern Literature: Jill McCorkle on 'Life After Life' And Death
- WTCI's 'Underground Revealed' Debuts
- Celebration of Southern Literature: A Chat with 'The Joker' Himself, Andrew Hudgins
- In Rural Virginia, Truckers Can Stop For Coffee And A Physical
Esquire Magazine: Bin Laden 'Shooter' On His Own; No Pension, No Healthcare
Originally published on Tue February 12, 2013 2:34 pm
Update at 8:12 p.m. ET. SEAL Is Eligible For Benefits
The newspaper also interviews Phil Bronstein, who wrote the Esquire piece. You can visit the Stars and Stripes website to see what he said.
Our original post:
Esquire magazine has quite the scoop today: Phil Bronstein, the former editor of The San Francisco Chronicle and now the executive chairman of the Center for Investigative Reporting, is previewing a profile of the man he says is the Navy SEAL who killed Osama Bin Laden.
First off, the caveats: Bronstein does not identify the SEAL and refers to him only as "the Shooter." He writes that "enough people connected to the SEALs and the bin Laden mission have confirmed for me that the Shooter" was "number two" in the mission. No. 1, Bronstein writes, confirmed the shooting "to another SEAL I spoke with" (emphasis ours).
Now that you know that: Bronstein reports that the "Shooter" is about to leave the SEALs and is facing an uncertain future. He writes:
"The Shooter will discover soon enough that when he leaves after sixteen years in the Navy, his body filled with scar tissue, arthritis, tendonitis, eye damage, and blown disks, here is what he gets from his employer and a grateful nation:
"Nothing. No pension, no health care, and no protection for himself or his family."
"He's taken monumental risks," the shooter's father tells Esquire. "But he's unable to reap any reward."
The full story will appear in the March issue of Esquire.